What if you made learning difficult?

Learning and talent is all supposed to hinge on ease of instruction.
But what if you made learning difficult?
And what if there was no apparent benefit or payoff?

One Indian researcher ended up doing just that, quite by mistake
In the year 1999, Sugata Mitra occupied an office at NIIT (a computer-training institute that has trained over five million students). And his office overlooked an urban slum in New Delhi.

A wall separated the slum from the office
So Sugata and his colleagues made a hole in the wall, and placed a computer in that hole. The monitor and the touch pad faced the slum. And the computer had a decently fast connection and was connected to the Internet.

Then Sugata and his colleagues sat back and watched.

What would happen next?
About eight hours later, an eight year-old child and six year-old girl were browsing the Internet.

Now the browser was in English, and technically at least, the kids didn’t speak the language.

But what if they were somehow helped?
There they were browsing the Internet, but hey, this was an urban slum. It’s possible that they were helped by someone with an understanding of computers, and/or an understanding of the foreign language.

This experiment was bringing up more questions than answers
So Sugata headed off to Shivpuri. Now Shivpuri is reasonably remote in the state of Madhya Pradesh.

They put another computer in the wall, and it was found by a 13-year old school dropout.

Yet in eight minutes, having never seen a browser before, he was busy browsing. By the evening, over seventy (yes, seventy) kids had begun to browse (again with no prior knowledge of browsers).

By the year 2000, the experiment had gone one step further.

Sugata took the experiment to a village called Madantusi, near Lucknow, in India.

Now if you know India, even just a little bit, you’ll know that English is all pervasive. Yes, the accents and the pronunciation is a bit different, but you can make yourself understood in English.

Well, the village of Madantusi didn’t seem to have an English teacher at all.
And once again, the computer was placed in the wall, this time with CDs available. And no Internet connection.

And the computer was left there for three whole months.

When Sugata came back three months later he was amazed
The little kids turned to him and said they needed a faster processor. And a better mouse.

How did the kids learn what they needed?
Amazingly, though all the terms and the information was in English, the kids taught themselves to understand the ‘code’ of English.

The kids were now using over 200 English words in conversations with each other.
In fact, in many instances, when the computers were hooked up to the Internet, the kids would search for a website that would teach them the English alphabet.

Are you stunned?

You should be.

Not only was the concept of the computer alien to most of the kids.
But the language was the equivalent of you reading an unknown language, like Swahili.
And yet, the kids quickly worked it out.

So how did they work it out?
Were they more talented?

As it turns out, they were not.

The kids were just kids from the village, who’d found something interesting.

So how did they pick up this talent of browsing, finding websites, and speaking a foreign language?

You see, talent is a matter of understanding code.
If code is simple to follow, then you understand and apply it.
But as it turns out, even when things are difficult, the human brain is able to work things out.

So why do we not become as talented as we should be?
Parents. And teachers.

The people who believe that we’re born to do certain things.
And not other things.
The people who tell us that nature, and family and heritage determines talent.

Time and time again, these parents and teachers tell us who we are.
And what we should be doing.
And what we can’t do.

But as it turned out, in this experiment there was no parent. Or teacher.
The hole in the wall computer was manned only by curious kids, eager to learn.
And to teach each other the ‘code’.

And time and again, they succeeded, across the length and breadth of India.
No matter what the level of education, or language, or diversity. The experiment played out almost the same way time and time again. And a whole bunch of kids became magically talented.

Which makes you wonder, eh?
Are parents, and teachers, and our school system…who believe in talent, the factor that kill our talents?

Hmmm…

Note: Watch the video below that details the experiment. If you’re reading this on email, you’ll have to go to https://brainaudit.com to watch the video. If you’re online, you can already see the video right under this line.

What If You Could Read Maps With Your Feet?

map.png

Could you read maps with your feet?
That’s not quite how we read maps, eh?

Some of us need directions, and need to close our eyes.
Some of us need to see a picture. And print the picture.
Some of us need explicit left-right directions.

But what if you weren’t any of those people mentioned above?

What if you read maps with your feet?
Gillian Lynne is a dancer.
Back in the 1930’s she was doing miserably at school.
The pictures didn’t help. The words didn’t help.

Obviously, nothing the teachers did or said got Gillian’s attention.
And she spiralled into, what we’d today call, a ‘challenged child.’
She was unfocused.
Fidgety.
Refused to learn.

So her mother took her to a doctor
Luckily the doctor wasn’t a teacher.
He turned on the radio, sneaked out of the room, and then asked Gillian’s mother to look at what Gillian was doing.

So what was she doing?
She was dancing.

Gillian didn’t think with her head. She thought with her feet.

All those words, and pictures, and blah-blah that was being taught at school was completely wasted on Gillian.
Because her method of learning, wasn’t words, or picture, or lecture-related.
It was all about dance.

Now here’s the sad story: Gillian went on to be famous
She went on to join the Royal Ballet.
She worked with the Royal Shakespeare Company, at West End, and was cast in roles on British Television.
She was the choreographer on the world-famous Andrew Lloyd Weber musical: Cats.
And then The Phantom of the Opera.

She was the director and choreographer of the Muppet Show.
She started her own dance school.
She did this and did that.

So why do I call it sad?
What if Gillian weren’t famous?
What if Gillian didn’t do what she did to become famous, but simply settled down for the rest of her life in the suburbs?

What then?

There are six billion talented people on the planet, all being fed with the school-system of teaching.
And for all practical reasons, at least five billion are getting the wrong instructions.

Which of course brings up the question
Do we really have dumb kids?
Do we really have dumb adults?
Do we really think that there are un-creative people out there?
Do we really think that Gillian couldn’t read maps by dancing on the map with her feet?

The method of teaching is wrong.
Yes, wrong.
We’re all fed with this same funnel of words. Mostly words.

The biggest chunk of your education is a matter of reading a book.
But what if someone could teach you through cartoons?
Or what if someone could teach you through music?
Or what if someone could teach you through dance?

The method of teaching is wrong.
Has always been. Well, it’s been right for some and wrong for many.
And it’s because we’ve never recognised the most important factor of all.
The factor that some of us, can indeed read maps best with our feet.

So how do you think best?
Post your answer in the comments below

Why ‘Sleeping On It’ Doesn’t Solve A Problem

Some people need time to take a decision They need to sleep on their decision, before making up their minds. So why do some people act so quickly, whereas others ruminate, and munch over their thoughts? And why is this munching so contrary to the normal working of our...

Can You Find A Three-Year Old Who Can’t Draw?

Here's a test. Find a three-year old. Any three-year old child. Give them a piece of paper. And some crayons. Then ask them to draw. Notice what happens next. They start drawing. Every single three-year old draws. Now try this same test with a group of kids that are...

How I Became ‘Talented’ At Writing

Is it true that I write six articles a week? No it's not. Many days I'll write six articles a day. And that's not bragging. And it's most certainly not talent. So what's the story: How did I get so darned prolific? I was forced by others to write at least twice a...

Analysing The Brains of Geniuses

Susan Polgar is the world's first female chess grandmaster. In fact, before Susan's 'sudden' arrival on the chess scene, people believed that the female brain was somehow inferior to the male brain. Especially when playing chess. And then Susan kinda burst that sad...

Making ‘Funny’ Work For You…

  Here's a cartoon. What's funny about it? Nothing. It's a guy on a boat. And an island in the distance. Now don't think of a funny line. Instead think of something disconnected. What's the last thing you'd expect to see in a scene like this? Put it down in the...

So how does ‘funny’ work?

How does 'funny' work? Let's look at few cartoons to begin with. Then let's look at a comedian in full flow. Then let's look at a video. And we'll do the impossible. We won't just analyse 'funny.' We'll replicate funny. We as in you and I. Yes, both of us. You're...

The Neuron Dance: How We Get Ideas

Have you ever seen fairy lights on a Christmas tree? Each bulb is connected to each other. Yet if one bulb fuses... The next one seems to fail. And then the chain seems to break. So if you started out with five hundred lights on your Christmas tree, the failure of one...

Why Some People Appear Smarter

Imagine you have a computer at home And this computer is linked to another two computers. And let's say you wanted to search for a file named 'monkey'. If you initiated a search, guess what you'd get? You'd get what you searched for: Namely all the files named...

The One Talent Everyone Seems To Have

I grew up in Mumbai, India. And in on my journey in the world of advertising, I ran into a creative director called Adi Pocha. Adi hired me to write 30-second commercial scripts for clients. Now I'm not really sure why he hired me. Because frankly, I didn't have any...

Are ‘Geniuses’ Liars?

Arthur Benjamin does some amazing feats of brain magic. He holds an entire audience in awe multiplying numbers such as 57,683 x 57,683. And says funny words like 'cookie fission'. Add 'kerry' to 'fission.' And then 'rev up', and add that to 'fission.' He has no...

Do ‘Creative People’ Need Less Practice?: The Momentum Factor

2007 World Skating Champion: Miki Ando When you look around you and see talented people you may run into a common misconception. You may believe that those considered 'talented' or 'creative' require less practice. Makes sense, huh? If you're already talented, where's...

The Bicycle Moment: When Everything Falls Together

If you learned to ride a bicycle, there's a pretty good chance you fell. And fell down a lot. I sure did. What's worse is I learned to ride on hills, with red mud. And that means there was a good chance of losing control on the slopes. And grazing your feet, hands and...

Music is music: Until you recognise the pattern

Frédéric-François Chopin I may have heard Chopin's Prelude No.4 a least a dozen times. Or may have never heard it at all. I couldn't tell you for sure, you see. Because there's all this classical music playing in the background when I go to hotels. And to airports....

The Definition of Patterning: Your Brain Slowed Down

So what is patterning? Patterning is simply a factor of: 1) Recognition. 2) Repetition. 3) Layering. Recognition comes first Imagine you're in a city you've never been to before. Around you are cobbled stone streets. Hey, you're in Rome. But you're hopelessly lost....

Understanding Patterns: How Your Brain Thinks

Imagine you went to a friend's house today. You're in your friend's kitchen. And you see a chair. And you sit down on that chair. How do you know it's safe to sit on that chair? But even more interestingly, how do you know it's a chair in the first instance? Your...

Will ‘layering’ cause you to become a clone?

Imagine you do a course with Psychotactics (e.g. the Article Writing Course). And you learn specific steps to write an article. Well, heck you're copying the steps, right? And that makes you a clone, right? Wrong. Well, not exactly wrong. The chances of others...

The Blockages to Learning: Sushi Learning

Do you like sushi? Or do you hate it? Or would you simply avoid it? You see sushi is a common dish across the world today. But there are people who don't have fun around sushi. To them, sushi is something scary, and different from steak and potatoes. Steak and...

Why Some Children Become Exceptionally Talented

Have you ever seen an seven-year old child playing the piano? Then listen to the same eight-year old playing the piano. And then that child struggles on to become a nine-year old playing the piano. And then he moves on to ten. And then suddenly at eleven, something...

The Slap on The Forehead: Pattern Recognition at work

We all believe that Einstein was talented. He wasn't. He just hit his forehead a lot. The Slap On The Forehead: What does it mean? Einstein wasn't talented. He developed pattern recognition. He worked out a pattern. Once you see the clarity of the pattern, it's like...